International Satoyama Intiative

IPSI, the International Partnership for the Satoyama Initiative, promotes collaboration in the conservation and restoration of sustainable human-influenced natural environments (Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes: SEPLS) through broader global recognition of their value.

Promoting co-management of socio-ecological landscapes in flood dependent agroforestry, pastoral and fishery systems of eastwards flowing rivers of Eastern Africa through scientific research and indigenous knowledge

SUBMITTED ORGANISATION : Kenya Wetlands Biodiversity Research Team (KENWEB)
  • Group:Water
REGION : ---
Google map: Google Map link to region
SUMMARY : Wetlands in Kenya are an important and comparatively new field of research. Civil society has been a major actor on wetlands through advocacy and events animated by a National Wetland forum that holds regular monthly meetings, and petitions in court against prospective developers with unsound EIAs, but, this forum has so far had no scientific arm and often lacks the capacity to provide science-based advice to user communities and policy. The KENWEB is a multidisciplinary team of wetlands biodiversity experts, hydrologists and anthropologists who have together developed a methodology of wetland biodiversity and ecosystem services assessment as a toolkit that can be applied to other tropical wetlands. Young scientists are mentored in various fields. The team has had in the past year of working together carried out two multi-disciplinary field expeditions in its case study sites, supported enrollment of postgraduate students in wetlands studies. An important output of the team has been that of dissemination to the public through an exhibition on the Tana Delta; a documentary on Participatory Science discussing issues regarding the Tana Delta wetlands and the role of KENWEB in providing answers to some of the socio-economic and political situations. Updates on the teams activities are available at
KEYWORD : Biodiversity, Socio-economics, East African Wetlands, Tana Delta, Loboi Swamp
AUTHOR: Kenya Wetlands Biodiversity Research Team (KENWEB) is a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional and international team composed of wetlands experts for the purpose of consolidating substantial experience to provide high quality data on wetlands and strengthening existing linkages among member institutions in wetlands research for conservation and management
LINK: ---

Project concept

Problem statement: Over the last fifty years, Eastern African wetlands in general and the lower floodplains in particular, have experienced major changes due to climate change, land use changes, upper catchment impoundments, agricultural irrigation schemes and species introductions. The effects of these changes have led to the loss of livelihoods for communities dependent directly on wetland resources. Rapid biodiversity loss in these wetlands has created a need for better assessments of the ecosystem functions, socio-economic values and important biodiversity. In the past, several independent studies have been carried out in some wetlands but information necessary for mitigation, conservation and management has failed to reach policy makers because of the inability to communicate it in a suitable form that would be effective for this purpose. This project intends to coordinate such a team. In order to acquire the amount and variety of data required for the assessment of ecosystem functioning of wetlands, a team of researchers from various fields is required. In other words a multi-disciplinary team consisting of biodiversity experts, hydrologists, ecologists and socio-economics experts is essential.

A need for multidisciplinary studies on Eastern African wetlands: Wetlands are considered as the most productive ecosystems of the planet (Barbier 1994, Costanza et al. 1997, Bravard et al. 2000) and provide various services both at the local and the global scale. As a consequence, such areas are used by a large number of stakeholders exploiting a variety of resources. Some of these resource uses are in competition and the wetland conversion or management envisaged by the different stakeholders may be incompatible. For example, wetlands are among the ecosystems strongly targeted by biodiversity conservation programmes but concurrently coveted for irrigation projects. Irrigation programmes, when they are not well designed or technically too ambitious, can destabilise the local livelihoods that are based on complementarities between agriculture, fishing, livestock keeping and other natural resource use activities in the socio-ecological landscape. Even though considered as productive, biodiversity of these wetlands and especially tropical wetlands are not well known and the services provided by its ecosystems are not well described.

Moreover, the natural resource use of these ecosystems, traditionally exploited by various user groups, is in general regulated by complex access rules and land tenure systems. These rules and regulations often have a temporal dimension adapted to the natural flood regime. For example, in the Casamance estuary in Senegal, M.C. Cormier- Salem (1992) describes an environment structured into “aquatic terroirs”, exploited by the local communities through various ways and means depending on their state of flooding. The lower delta of the Senegal River, before the construction of the Diama dam, was similarly structured as a multi-use system (Duvail 2001): land is not appropriated exclusively by a single community but characterised by a multiplicity of rights for access, resource use and exploitation depending on the season. This type of complexity is not specific to coastal wetlands and also characterises the differentiated access rights in the Inner Delta of the Niger River. Here the balance of power between the various user groups is based on time-honoured covenants on the use of land and resources which go so far as to define „ethnicity‟ on the basis of resource use specialisation. C. & O. Barrière (1995) used the term “foncier-environnement” to describe this form of spatial organisation based on the partitioning of aquatic resources. In order to facilitate the understanding of these complex systems of land and resource tenure, the AFREPA („Association pour la Promotion des Recherches et Etudes Foncières en Afrique‟) has defined a typology of land tenure going from simple access to total control (including the right of transfer) (Le Bris et al. 1991, Le Roy et al. 1996). These access rules and the ways and means through which they are applied are complex, dynamic and usually unknown to the government institutions who often superimpose their own legislation onto the system by privatisation or by state control. However, some solid theory (Ostrom 1990) and various examples (Berkes et al. 1989) show that the common resource governance, widespread in rural Africa is economically efficient, socially acceptable and ecologically sustainable (Borrini-Feyerabend et al. 2004).

Complex, coveted, unknown, wetlands are also fragile. They depend strongly on the supply of freshwater from groundwater or from upstream and therefore on land use in their catchment. In the strongly seasonal environments of sub-Saharan Africa, the annual flood is a key element structuring the landscape and determines to a large extent the productivity of wetland ecosystems and therefore their associated livelihoods. Impeding the natural flows of water and sediments and altering natural seasonal patterns of river discharge has repercussions on the functioning of the wetland ecosystems.

Over the last fifty years, African wetlands ecosystems have experienced major changes for four main reasons:

-  Increased extreme events due to climate change (IPCC 2007), with both prolonged droughts and extreme rainfall and flooding. Predictions for Africa are an increased frequency of very dry and very wet years and an increase in the frequency and intensity of tropical storms in the Southern Indian Ocean (Boko et al. 2007) in a changing climate context change in rainfall pattern at the river basin scale land use change, typically deforestation, has impacted on run-off conditions and modified the hydrology with an increased risk for severe flooding (Bradshaw et al. 2007), a decline in dry season flows and an increase in sediment loads (Syvitski et al. 2005)

-  Hydro-dam construction which alters the hydrology of the rivers even more radically as the natural flood peak is reduced or suppressed altogether. Though dams have obvious advantages (development of irrigated agriculture, supply of electricity and water to urban areas, river regulation for navigation) the flood releases from the dams are often programmed according to sectoral needs (World Commission on Dams 2000) and the resulting reduction or suppression of flood peaks has negative impacts on downstream wetland ecosystems (Bergkamp et al. 2000). The creation of stagnant waters within a river system transforms the composition and structure of biological communities, directly by modifying migration patterns and indirectly by hydrochemical changes.

-  Numerous irrigated agriculture projects, in the rift valley for flower farming and on the coast for biofuel production, have converted or are planning to convert large tracts of land. Water abstraction for irrigation can potentially have strong impacts on downstream hydrology both quantitatively and qualitatively by the increased discharge of fertiliser and pesticides (Davis & Koop 2006, Johnson & Ebert 2000) while at the same time the exclusion of the multi-user groups from the vast tracks of land they traditionally exploited can destabilise the local economy.

In combination, these oncoming changes have the potential to destabilise the local wetland-dependent economies (Snoussi et al. 2007). To avoid the conversion of wetlands at the expense of the local users, decision-makers will need tools allowing them to ensure an equitable partitioning of water resources across different uses (local, agricultural, hydropower, environmental).

Integrated management of the wetland: Still, economic development does not automatically lead to biodiversity losses nor does it irrevocably cause a crisis in the local economies. It is possible to manage the water in ways that take into account the production objectives and, at the same time, are respectful of the water needs of the traditional users and the wetland ecosystems.

However, effective management of the wetland requires: – a better description of the biodiversity values of the wetland – a hydrologic model and a spatialised hydraulic model of the wetland. – a thorough understanding of the water needs of the ecosystem in quantitative terms. – a detailed analysis of the practices and socio-economic strategies of the various stakeholders and a quantification of the water demand.

Unfortunately, the impact assessments of the various projects are often conducted under time constraints that do not allow adequate description of the existing biodiversity and of the resource use calendars (fishing, agriculture, livestock keeping, gathering, etc.) under various flood regimes. Detailed descriptions and spatial models of the interactions between the hydrology, the availability of the natural resources and its biodiversity values and their use may contribute to improve the decision making process.


Traditional natural resource management: As the Tana River flows through semi‐arid lands its water is a highly precious commodity attracting different types of socio ecological landscape uses. Historically, complementary and mutually beneficial resource exploitation strategies between the various user groups have always regulated rights of access to key resources, especially during the dry season. Elders of both Pokomo and Orma groups would jointly perform the required rituals after which the Orma could access water‐points and floodplain pasture (Kagwanja 2003). In combination with low population density and sufficiently regular and extensive flooding these practices have allowed the different ecosystems to thrive and maintain the exceptional biodiversity. Thus 19th century explorers that travelled along the river described “an impenetrable jungle” and “beautifully foliaged trees covered with creepers fringed both banks of the river” (Gedge 1892, cited in Hughes 1984). Indeed, the forests, and especially the clay evergreen forest are considered a highly valuable resource even today (Luke et al. 2005). About a hundred plant species from the forests are commonly used by local people, especially for technology (43 species) and construction (34 species), traditional remedies (23 species) and food (15 species) and the main impact on forest structure is the use of large trees for canoes or beehives (Medley 1993), honey being particularly important to the Pokomo. Because of the shifting and meandering nature of the river and the forest use practices, the forest always has different stages of succession and is characterized by dynamic carbon storage (Glenday 2005). Though they need large trees, Red Colobus seem to prefer forest edges over mature forest (Mbora and Meikle 2004a) and the semi‐terrestrial Tana Mangabey are well adapted to a landscape mosaic with alternating small fields, bush and forest at different stages of maturity. According to Terer et al. (2004) the floodplain wetlands and in particular the oxbow lakes (recession agriculture of sorghum and millet, fishing, reeds for roof thatch, fresh water, grazing) are also considered of high value, as is the Tana River itself (water for various uses including irrigation, transportation, sand for building and as a protective barrier against bandits). The floodplains have a very important function also in the attenuation of flood peaks through the overspilling of the banks, storage on the floodplains and in the oxbow lakes, infiltration into soils raising the groundwater level, etc. thus protecting downstream areas from their destructive power. Though hunting is illegal in Kenya the rich wildlife associated with this mosaic of different forest types, wetlands, rangelands and small‐scale agriculture continues to provide animal protein. Elephants have virtually disappeared during the late 1980s, because of intensive poaching, but various ungulate species are still quite abundant in the area and human wildlife conflict, especially with buffalo, is a major complaint of the local communities when interacting with the Kenya Wildlife Service.

For the Rufiji system, as described in Duvail, Hamerlynck (2007) the river is part of the identity of the Warufiji. There is no “Warufiji” tribe as such as the designation covers a mixture of several lineages and ethnic groups, around the eponymous Rufiji River. These define themselves as floodplain farmers in contrast to the hill tribes that practice shifting cultivation in the coastal forests and with whom they have a “joking relationship” (Radcliffe-Brown, 1940, 1949). Floods are essential for the sustenance of floodplain fertility, and therefore of the farming system, and as vital for the productivity of most of the natural resources on which the communities depend: forestry, fisheries, wildlife and, more recently, grazing. The farming system is well adapted to the variation of the hydrological conditions and is rather sophisticated: the Rufiji Floodplain farmers have come to grips with the interplay between short rains crops, long rains crops, floods and recession agriculture and the subtle use of the topographical variability, which determines the nature of the soils and their flooding frequency. On the higher non-floodable levees, farmers plant perennial crops (mango, cashew, banana) and some annual rainfed crops (maize, sorgho, sesame). In the floodable area, the preferred farmland is on the Mbawila soils of the levees, consisting of loam and fine sand, relatively easy to work, well drained and suitable for a variety of crops but in general dominated by maize. These soils are most commonly interspersed with the lower- lying depressions with Finyanzi (dark heavy clay), which are suitable for rice. By cultivating a number of small plots (about 0.4 ha each) with different soil types and at different topographical levels, often at dispersed locations, each household harvests from about 1.5 ha of cleared floodplain land each year with double crops in years of good rainfall and/or adequate floods. Inside each plot, by making judicious use of their knowledge of the land, they also plant according to a risk avoidance strategy, intercropping maize with rice on the slopes of the depressions and using different varieties planted at different times. Thus, under a wide range of rainfall and flood behaviour, they are likely to achieve sustenance and in, favourable years, produce considerable surplus. Under such favourable circumstances the staple food crops (rice and maize) are also the main cash crops in Rufiji. For one given year, the success of these two staple foods is dependent on a subtle balance between rainfall and flood characteristics. The best agricultural scenario for a farmer is when there is conjunction between a good rainy season and a flood. Most of the “safety nets” (fisheries, hunting, gathering of wild fruits and honey) are also favourably influenced by the flood. Even though virtually all floodplain users identify themselves as farmers, agriculture accounts for only about 37% of average household income, which is supplemented by fishing, forestry (especially in drought years) and a host of other activities.

The importance of recognition of these traditional management systems is for the purpose of ensuring that modern management systems for these landscapes applies a bottom-up approach that ensures sustainability of conservation and an equilibrium in the balance between resource use and management. For co-management to be efficient there must be ability to agree upon, guarantee of equity and implementation of a fair share of management functions, benefits and responsibilities of a socio ecological landscape. This definition applied from „Sharing power’ by Borrini et al. 2004 emphasises on the need for trust among partners, consideration of diverse interest of communities and need to apply an iterative or participatory process and to build upon customary and local organisations.

Study sites: Two study areas Tana and Rifiji River Deltas (Kenya and Tanzania respectively) have been chosen for the present.  These will serve as models for study of other eastward flowing rivers. They have been chosen since both have experienced major changes in their hydrology and both are currently targeted by development projects that could greatly modify the functioning of the landscapes and the livelihoods of the local communities.

Location of Study Sites


The Lower Rufiji Valley: The Rufiji is the main river in East-Africa (in terms of discharge, it is the 6th biggest river in Africa). The site is of interest for several reasons. From an analytical point of view, various data are available on this study site. Some studies on the agricultural practices (Bantje 1980, Havnevik 1993) from the 1970s by the BRALUP (Bureau for Resource Assessment and Land Use Planning). The IRD-IRA-IFRA project on the lower valleys has produced some hydrological, climatic, environmental and socio-economical data that can be exploited in an integrated modelling exercise.
From a management point of view, the Stiegler’s Gorge dam project, if implemented, would have a profound influence on the area. Most of the agricultural production of the area is flood-dependant and the sophistication of the traditional farming system has long been recognised by the research community (Havnevik 1993, Hamerlynck 2003). However, at the local administration and central government levels the predominant view is that the traditional system is ‘primitive’ and inefficient (Duvail and Hamerlynck, 2007). This was one of the reasons why, during Ujamaa villagisation, farmers were uprooted from their familiar agro-ecological zone, the floodplain. The dam construction plans would limit the peak flood discharge to 2500 m3/s, confining the river to its dry season channel and effectively excluding the continuation of recession agricultural practices. The economics of replacing these practices by irrigation are very negative, even under highly optimistic assumptions of irrigated surface areas and yields. As the main objective of the dam is the production of hydropower (for export to Southern Africa) the impacts on agriculture have not been sufficiently taken into account. The dam would also have very negative impacts on downstream ecosystems and on flood-dependent livelihoods (fisheries, mangrove exploitation, etc.). It would therefore seem to be necessary to rethink the dam design from a managed flood release perspective. The design of a managed flood release scenario that would maintain ecosystems and livelihoods downstream has to be based on sound knowledge of the current natural resource use practices and strategies (Duvail & Hamerlynck, 2006). In parallel, numerous irrigation projects are under development for the Lower Rufiji Floodplain, either for cotton or for sugarcane for agrofuel production. These are likely to compete for water and land resources with the traditional farming and fisheries practices.

The Tana Delta: The functioning of the coastal wetlands associated to the lower valley of the Tana have been strongly impacted by the alterations in its catchment. The study of how this came about and what it implies is highly relevant for the implementation of our research. The Tana is the largest river in Kenya. It originates in the Aberdare Mountains and the Mount Kenya and  subsequently flows through about a thousand kilometres of drylands in eastern Kenya where its average flow is around 150m3/s. Its river basin covers approximately 127,000 km². In its lower part, the river has built up a delta of about 1300 km². Five hydropower dams were constructed in its upper reaches: Kindaruma (1968), Kamburu (1975), Gitaru (1978), Masinga (1981) and Kiambere (1988). These 5 dams produce 3/4 of the power needs of Kenya and also supply the capital Nairobi with domestic water.

The Tana River Delta is currently confronted to a substantial reduction of river discharge and a decrease in the amplitude of the flood peaks, which is bimodal because of the two rainy seasons. The decrease in the amplitude of the flood peak is particularly significant since the completion of the Masinga Dam in 1981 (Maingi & Marsh, 2002). A new dam, downstream of the 5 existing dams, has been proposed at Mutonga-Grand Falls. This dam would further more attenuate the bimodal flood peak with highly negative impacts on fish production (Mavuti 1994 in Emerton 2003) and on the riverine forest (Maingi & Marsh, 2002). The livelihoods of the 200,000 inhabitants of the Lower Valley, dependent on recession agriculture, fisheries and livestock keeping, would be seriously affected (Emerton 2003). The attenuation of the flood peaks will also have impacts on the livelihoods of the nomadic livestock keepers and their estimated 2.5 million heads of cattle that currently use the pastures in the middle and lower reaches of the valley (CADP 1991 in Emerton 2003).

However, none of these impacts have been quantified in detail, nor spatialised. The ecological studies in the Lower Valley were primarily targeted at the floodplain forests upstream of the delta because of the presence of the red-listed endemic primates Tana River Red Colobus (Procolobus rufomitratus) and Tana Mangabey (Cercopithecus galeritus). Densities of Red Colobus are strongly correlated with forest quality, notably the presence of trees with a large diameter

(Mbora & Meikle 2004a). In its turn forest quality if strongly correlated with the flood hydrograph (flood height, frequency and duration) that determine forest regeneration and groundwater level (Hughes 1990).

A recent development is the proposal for a vast irrigated sugar cane project for agrofuel production, If implemented this will result in strongly reduced freshwater outflow to the ocean. The local economies will be strongly affected.

Research plan and methodology

The project objectives are: 1/ to establish a methodology for rapid but high quality description of biodiversity values and ecosystem services by wetlands, 2/ to make an inventory and consolidate information on the biodiversity of wetlands and to assess the distribution of various taxa and analyse their conservation status; 3/to undertake simple hydrologic modelling of these wetlands allowing projection of flooding and drought events 4/ produce a thorough understanding of water needs of the wetland ecosystem and wetland users 5/ to mentor students and young scientists into field studies, laboratory analyses, data analyses and publishing on wetlands, 6/ to involve local communities in responsibility for wetlands management and 7/ Liase with environmental advocacy groups, NEMA, and other government agencies in policy issues including the Kenya wetland management plan and Ramsar designation of wetlands of international importance.

Proposed Cluster activities

Cluster 1: Knowledge Facilitation: Synthesis and normalisation of the existing data at different scales (local, river basin, regional).

In this first step, all the participants put the relevant data in common. It includes the scientific data, the technical data (project document) and empiric data (local knowledge).

-  Deliverables: Inventories are developed on Hydrology, Climatology, Topography

-  Description of the ecosystem functioning, fisheries database, biodiversity inventory

-  Stakeholder identification and their resource management practices

-  Description of the political, economical and legal context

-  Data are normalised and integrated in GIS maps to show land and resource use

Cluster 2: Policy Research

Members of KENWEB have been and will continue to be involved directly in policy issues through participation of the Wetlands managment plan for Kenya, Ramsar designation the Rufiji delta (2003), manamangement plan for the Rufiji Ramsar site, proposed Ramsar designation of the Tana River Delta.  In Kenya, this activity is the mandate of the Kenya Wildlife Services.  The Ramsar designation of the Tana River Delta as a wetland of international importance has stalled in the last years due to the difficulties related to the multidisplinary nature of the data required and the need for conclusive community awareness in order to ensure that a management plan will be accepted.

In addition the National Museum of Kenya has recognised the lower Tana region for its unique culture, archaeological sites and other values that would qualify for the designation as a National and international Heritage site.  The data/information will be used also to emphasis the value of the wetland to the identity of the community.  Ensuring that sacred sites and important monuments are considered and recognised.

KWS, which is a member of KENWEB has the mandate for conservation and management of wetlands within protected areas (parks and reserves) but also to propose designation of important areas of international importance.  In this regard, they are the focal point for the process and will coordinate the completion and submission of Ramsar information sheet for theTana River Delta as a wetland of international importance and input into the National Wetland Management Plan for adoption by policy makers.

Cluster 3: Indicators Research

Indicators of resilience of the ecosystem will be linked with user strategies and various scenarios in relation to the environment considered.  Their hydrological, ecological, socio-economic impacts will be modelled.  For this, three activities are proposed: biodiversity assessments, description of user strategies and prospective analyses.

Biodiversity assessment: The objective of this task is to describe the biodiversity values and services of a functional wetland (i.e. flooded periodically).

Fish – A network of local observers will be organised in order to study the local fisheries. In parallel, experimental fishing will be conducted in both wetlands in order to analyse the diversity of fishes. Specimens from the study will be preserved according to museum standards for curation at the National Museums of Kenya Ichthyology section.

Birds – Visual observations of birds in various habitats will be made.  Timed species-counts may be used to build to establish the relative abundance of canopy and mid-level bird species. Where possible, mistnetting will be carried out for 3 hours at dawn or before sunset.  Point counts (with distance sampling): although not as comprehensive as TSCs in building species lists will be ideal for monitoring purposes and for making comparisons between habitat types. Visual counts aill be performed where possible for highly visible colony nesting species, eg herons, egrets, and sacred ibis

Mammals: Small mammals: Sherman traps will be set in to study rodents and shrews baited either with coconut cubed fried in edible oil plus peanut butter. Captured specimens will be identified, marked and released after marking and a few specimens prepared for preservation and curation. Large mammal surveys will be conducted through direct observations or indirect via footprints, nests, urine marking sites and dung; Small nocturnal primates (bush babies) will be sampled using Chardanorette cages set on trees in each habitat class. Small carnivores will be sampled using universal cages of varying sizes. Other methods including vocalisations, sightings, scats, pellets, dung and tracks will also be used. Primates are studied by noting troop number, composition, activities and type of tree perched recorded.

Herpetofauna sampling accomplished through: Timed limited searches (TLS): which is a time constrained search-and-seize method. All possible reptilian and amphibian microhabitats such as under leaves, debris, logs, decomposing tree stumps and logs, on trees and shrubs, ponds and water pools will be intensively searched including digging. This yields number of species recorded per person-hour. Trapping with pitfall traps along drift fences: X-shaped drift fence and pitfall trap arrays with 5-m segments will be used. The pitfall traps will consist of 10 litre plastic buckets dug in so that they are flush with the ground. In total every fence is equipped with 5 buckets. Two trap arrays will be set in each site for upto five consecutive days. Visual encounter surveys (VES): This un-standardized method will be used only for collecting descriptive data, mainly presence or absence of species. Due to its flexibility and being opportunistic it will contribute a lot in generation of species inventories. These surveys will be done along all 12 permanent transects, both during the day and at night.

Invertebrates: Pitfalls (made from buckets) will be set in study areas and checked every four days.  Sweeping using nets and baited butterfly traps will also used. Specialised methods for certain groups will be applied:

  • Collecting butterflies: sweep netting along selected transects and baited butterfly traps.
  • For litter dwelling arthropods: Pitfalls
  • Litter sieving & visual searches: Litter sieving will involve collecting litter on the ground, placing it in a special litter sieve and shaking thoroughly on top of white bed sheet. Spiders crawling on the sheet will be collected with a pooter (aspirator).
  • Visual searches will also be carried out for spiders on habitats such as below logs and at base of trees.
  • Aquatic invertebrates will be sampled using funnel-mouthed traps baited with meat.

Plants: Plant resources assessed for diversity and abundance.  Levels of threat and the presence of rare plants will also be recorded.  Voucher specimens will be collected for identification (if field identification is not possible) at the East African Herbarium at NMK. Direct disturbance indicators such as cut stems, charcoal kilns, grazing animals, footpaths and cattle tracks will be recorded.

Description of users’ strategies

- An identification of social groups and the social dynamics: The local communities are composed of distinct social groups whose interests are not necessarily converging and may even be incompatible. Complementary, competitive or exploitative relationships between these groups can exist. For example, the ways and means of market integration (as one of the natural resource use determinants) are gender specific with a much greater social and spatial mobility of men who are also in a more favourable socio-economic position. Other groupings exist and the research needs to identify these. The make-up of different social groups with distinct strategies cannot be solely explained on the basis of a synchronous analysis. A historical approach is a necessity, also for a prospective analysis and the elaboration of scenarios of the possible evolutionary developments.

- A description of the natural resource use practices and strategies: The natural resource use practices have to be documented and the impact of the various extant use strategies analysed. The impact evaluation is difficult because of the number and the complexity of the factors determining the outcome. Resource use strategies have to be analysed beyond the discourse that the users hold about them by confronting these with the reality of the practices (which are the expression of the strategies). The analysis therefore has to be based on the collection of economic, social and spatial data. Maps are a means toward the formulation of hypotheses on natural resource use practices: a spatial representation of resource use practices permits an analysis of the coherence (ecological, economic, cultural) of the resource use strategies. The spatial organisation of each study site will be incorporated into a Geographic Information system (GIS) allowing the production of detailed maps.

Prospective analysis: In this step of the programme, several water management scenarios will be considered and their hydrological, ecological, socio-economic impacts will be modelled. Data acquisition is planned with stageboard installation in collaboration with WRMA (Water Resource Management Authority).  Hydraulic models for the floodplain and delta developed under the earlier projects by IRD partners will be used. Physico-chemical parameters of the water will also be tested in order to compare the quality of water. These parameters are useful for understanding the composition of fish fauna and their distribution.  They include: Depth, Dissolved Oxygen, B.O.D, Chlorophyll, temperature, pH, Total Dissolved Solutes.

Cluster 4: Capacity Building

Primary/Elementary schools: (1) Distribution of wetlands awareness materials current including ‘Wenyeji wa Mtoni’ a colouring story book about a village dependant on a river for water source for drinking, cooking, hygiene, agriculture and fishing.  The book published by Dr. Mordecai Ogada (a member of KENWEB) raises awareness on dangers of pollution and and importance of habitat.  The book is targeted for ages 5 to 10. (2) Awareness through Drama, Poetry and Art – Children from primary schools have been involved in in presentations of drama, poetry and art during the World Wetland day celebrations at the National Museums of Kenya annually. This media has proved very effective in sharing knowledge among schools.  Schools will be encouraged to maintain weather stations, and records of biodiversity within their schools and environs.

Secondary Schools: Creating awareness in secondary schools through assisting science clubs in inventories and conservation activities.  Use of annual Secondary school science fairs as a forum for presentation and transfer on biological technologies for improved livelihood strategies such as aquaculture, recycling of water in schools, reforestations and restoration of landscapes among others.

University and Technical Schools: – Most members of the team operate as full time or part time lecturers at various universities including Moi University, at the KWS Training institute, at the University of Nairobi, at the National Museums of Natural History in France among others). The research programme on wetlands will enrich the lectures given on wetlands. Capacity building is further enhanced through the involvement of the two partners from the University of Nairobi – the Geology Department and the school of Biological studies.  The former has a well developed curriculum in hydrology while the latter has hydrobiology courses for both undergraduate and Master’s students. Their involvement in the project will encourage Kenyan students leaving university to develop interests in following careers and research in wetland issues.  - In the field, Master and PhD students will be co-supervised by the members of the team. Capacity will be built by having the students participating in the multidisciplinary field trips and by tasking them with specific research outputs.

Scientific facilitation, knowledge sharing and transfer of technology: As regard to the scientific facilitation, knowledge sharing and transfer of technology, KENWEB research findings and developed methodology for rapid assessment of the biodiversity of the tropical wetlands will be shared with the scientific community through publication of papers in international journal. To this objective, writing workshops retreats will be organised in order to support the common publication by spending a few days in an isolated place. Presentation at conferences will also be organised.

KENWEB findings will also be communicated to the Kenya Wetlands Forum, an informal but very active entity hosted by the East African Wildlife Society. This forum, composed of various participants including those of the proposed young team, has ample experience in advocacy on wetland issues but has a great need for sound scientific data and information to support their advocacy, legal,  management advice and wetland governance processes.

The accumulated knowledge will be shared with the decision-makers and the user communities so they can incorporate the advice in the design of their management plans and develop monitoring systems that allow them to adapt the management to changing circumstances.

Eventually the project is expected to support the development of a multi-institutional network on the tropical wetlands with a capacity to provide expertise as new issues emerge (climate change, biofuels, etc.).

Cluster 5: On-the-Ground Activities

Empowering local communities: In order to empower local communities, co-management, which involves approaches of sharing power over resource management, will be emphasised.  The definition we will use is that of Borrini et al. 2004, Sharing power which is “ partnership by which 2 or more relevant social actors collectively negotiate, agree upon, guarantee and implement a fair share of management functions, benefits and responsibilities for a particular territory, area or set of natural resources »

This definition encompasses the some key principles of co-management such as:

  • Development of trust
  • Take into account the diversity of interests within the communities
  • Initiate a flexible iterative negotiation process (requires adjustments, re-elaboration)
  • Build on customary and local organisations

Following experiences from the Rufiji case studies during the development of a management plan, each community will be encouraged and assisted to develop a Village Environmental Management Plan with a zoning and mapping of their territories.  This involves Participatory mapping of the wetlands in order to capture the community’s perception of their ecosystem and to ensure a real projection of the activities and various categories of vegetation, land use, map their sacred sites and other landscape values are recognised and document. In Tanzania, the National law recognised the VEMP, during the Ramsar process of the Tana Delta, a similar approach should be applied.

Researchers will provide technical support in the process by applying GIS and Cartography skills.  In addition, existing community-based groups will be encouraged through training and workshops to apply sustainable use and restoration of the environment.

Participatory research approach: The emphasis will be on the creation of operational teams composed of local users in charge of monitoring (hydrology, meteorology, fisheries, household food consumption), coordinated logistically by local government technical staff (Water Resource Management Authority, Kenyan Meteorological Department) and supervised by scientists. Where possible all the data collected will be in conformity with the existing national networks and integrated into them (e.g., hydrology, climate). Thus the research teams will also benefit from the technical support of the National Offices and the approach will in general favour exchanges between national and international research programmes and management institutions. The approach includes capacity building through training of local observers for data recording and analysis, training of local government technical staff in database management and the organisation of joint feedback and analysis sessions of the collected information bringing together different perceptions of the observed phenomena. Workshops bringing together local observers, managers at different levels and scientists will be held.

Expected results and deliverables

On research:

- Produce a comprehensive scientific reference collection of biodiversity of the studied area with descriptions of various new species and populations of known species and the, development of a biodiversity checklist.

-        Contribute to the understanding of the functioning of the studied wetland

-        Contribute to the mainstreaming of ecosystem services analysis in the development planning of the East African wetlands.

-        Publication in international peer-reviewed journals

On methodology:

-        Develop a methodology for rapid assessment of Biodiversity of the Tropical wetlands. Methodological guidelines will be produced and published

-        Contribute to improved linkages between hydrodynamic modelling, Ecological and socio-economical studies

-        Capacity building in wetlands studies.

On policy and management:

-        Progress on Ramsar desgination of the Tana River Delta

-        Development of Co-management plan and methods for both socio ecological landscapes

-        Production of management and conservation recommendation for Tana  and Rufiji delta wetlands.  .

-        Empower local communities in monitoring and management of natural resources

-        For each study site highlight potential competition or incompatibility between various land and water uses

-        Produce an awareness raising and debate generating tool for the joint management of wetlands.

-        Strenghten the development of a multi-institutional network, i.e. a think-tank on the tropical  wetlands


Publications by the Team on East African wetlands

1. Hamerlynck O., Duvail S., Nyingi D., Paul J.L., Yanda P., Mgaya Y., Mwaitega S., Lamtane H.A, Vandepitte L., Kindinda K. & Mwakalinga A.B. (In preparation : abstract accepted). Floods and fisheries-based livelihoods in the floodplain lakes of the Lower Rufiji, Tanzania. Hydrological Sciences Journal – Special Issue on ecosystem services of wetlands.

2. Lebrun D., Hamerlynck O., Duvail S., Nyunja J. (in press) The importance of flexibility: an analysis of the large- scale Tana Delta irrigation project in Kenya, implemented under an estate system. In Calas et al. (eds) “Shared Waters, Shared Opportunities”, IFRA and Hakimani College.

3. Duvail S., Hamerlynck O., Hoag H., Paul J.L.,Yanda P. (in press) The large-scale irrigation potential of the Lower Rufiji Floodplain (Tanzania): Reality or persistent myth? In Calas et al. (eds) “Shared Waters, Shared Opportunities”, IFRA and Hakimani College.

4. Duvail S., Paul J.L., Medard C. (In Press) « Les communautés locales face aux grands projets d‟aménagement des zones humides côtières en Afrique de l‟Est », Politique Africaine.

5. Stéphanie Duvail, Patrick Valimba, Judith Nyunja, Dorothy Wanja Nyingi, Olivier Hamerlynck, Crystèle Léauthaud, Jean Albergel (2010) Floods and Ecosystem Services in Coastal Wetlands. Proceedings of the national workshop on research in the water sector on informing policy formulation,held at Utalii college, nairobi, on 5th may, 2010. pp 14-28

6. Hamerlynck, O., Nyunja, J., Luke, Q., Nyingi, D., Lebrun, D. & Duvail, S. 2010. The communal forest, wetland, rangeland and agricultural landscape mosaics of the Lower Tana, Kenya, a socio-ecological entity in peril. In: C. Belair, K. Ichikawa, B.Y. L. Wong, and K.J. Mulongoy (Eds.). Sustainable use of biological diversity in socioecological production landscapes, Background to the „Satoyama Initiative for the benefit of biodiversity and human well-being. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series no. 52.

7. Duvail S., Mwakalinga A.B., Eijkelenburg A., Hamerlynck O., 2009, « Hydrological modelling of the floodplain- adjacent lakes in the Lower Rufiji (Tanzania) » CD-ROM des Actes de la Conférence internationale « Implementing Environmental Water Allocations », Port Elizabeth, Afrique du Sud. 23-26 février 2009.

8. Luke, Q. & Hamerlynck, O. 2009. “A population of the Tana River Red Colobus Procolobus rufomitratus rufomitratus in the Tana Delta, Kenya”. Primate Tidings 21:12-14. 9. Lebrun Delphine 2009 « An irrigation project slowing down development: Waiting for rice ». Revue Mambo, Volume VIII, N°2, IFRA, Nairobi, Kenya.



1.       Barbier, E.B., 1994. Valuing environmental functions : tropical wetlands. Land Econ. 70 : 155-173.

2.       Barrière C. et Barrière O., 1995. Le Foncier-Environnement. Pour une gestion viable des ressources naturelles renouvelables au Sahel. ORSTOM – CNRS – AFVP – CIRAD – Min. Coop – Min. Environnement, 517 p.

3.       Bergkamp G., McCartney M., Dugan P., McNeely J. & Acreman M., 2000. Dams, Ecosystem functions and Environmental Restoration. Thematic Review II.1, prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town,, 187 p.

4.       Berkes, F., Feeny, B.J., Mccay, B.J. & Acheson, J.M. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340: 91-93.

5.       Boko, M., I. Niang, A. Nyong, C. Vogel, A. Githeko, M. Medany, B. Osman-Elasha, R. Tabo and P. Yanda, 2007: Africa. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 433-467.

6.       Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M.T., Kothari, A. & Renard, Y. 2004. Sharing power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. IIED IUCN/CEESP/CMWG, Cenesta, Téhéran, Iran. 456 pp.

7.       Bradshaw, C.J.A., Navjot, S.S., Peh K. S.-H., & Brook, B.W. 2007. Global evidence that deforestation amplifies flood risk and severity in the developing world. Global Change Biology (OnlineEarly Articles). doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01446.x

8.       Bravard J.P., Lesueur P., Marion L., 2000. La dynamique des flux, la rétention et le renouvellement des sédiments, In Fustec E. et al. (Eds) “Fonctions et valeurs des zones humides”, Dunod, Paris : 107-128

9.       CADP, 1991. Tana River Livestock Survey, Coast ASAL Development Programme, Ministry for the Reclamation and Development of Arid and Semi-Arid Lands and Water Resources, Mombasa.

10. Cormier-Salem M.C., 1992, Gestion et évolution des espaces aquatiques : la Casamance, Paris, Editions de l’ORSTOM, Collection Etudes et Thèses, 583 p.

11. Costanza, R., d‟Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O‟Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & Van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world‟s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 : 253-260.

12. Davis, J.R. & Koop, K. 2006, Eutrophication in Australian rivers, reservoirs and estuaries – a southern hemisphere perspective on the science and its implications. Hydrobiologia 559: 23-76.

13. Duvail S., 2001. Scénarios hydrologiques et modèles de développement en aval d’un grand barrage. Les usages de l‟eau et le partage des ressources dans le delta mauritanien du fleuve Sénégal. Thèse en Géographie de l’Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, 313 p.

14. Emerton, L. 1994. An Economic Valuation of the Costs and Benefits in the Lower Tana Catchment Resulting from Dam Construction, Report prepared by Acropolis Kenya Ltd for Nippon Koei, Nairobi.

15. Harper, D.M., Brooks Childress, R., Harper, M.M., Boar, R.R., Hickley, P., Mills, S.C., Otieno, N., Drane, T., Vareschi, E., Nasirwa, O., Mwatha, W.E., Darlington, J.P.E.C. and Escute ́-Gasulla, X. (2003) Aquatic biodiversity and saline lakes: Lake Bogoria National Reserve, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 500, 259–276.

16. IPCC, 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA.

17. Johnson, A.K.L. & Ebert, S.P. 2000. Quantifying inputs of pesticides to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park – a case study in the Herbert River catchment of North-East Queensland. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41: 302-309.

18. Le Bris E., Le Roy E., Mathieu P., 1991. L’appropriation de la terre en Afrique noire, manuel d’analyse, de décision et de gestion foncières. Editions Karthala, Paris, 359 p.

19. Le Roy E., Karsenty A., Bertrand A., 1996. La sécurisation foncière en Afrique : pour une gestion viable des ressources renouvelables, Karthala, 388 p.

20. Mainga, J.K. & Marsh, S.E. 2002. Quantifying hydrological impacts following dam construction along the Tana River, Kenya. Journal of Arid Environments 50: 53-79.

21. Mavuti K. 1994. Limnology and Fisheries of the Lower Tana River, Report prepared by Acropolis Kenya Ltd for Nippon Koei, Nairobi.

22. Ostrom 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

23. Snoussi,M., Kitheka, J., Shagude, Y., Kane, A., Arthurton, R., Le Tissier, M.,& Virji, H. 2007. Downstream and coastal impacts of damming and water abstraction in Africa. Environmental Management 39: 587-600.

24. Syvitski, J., Vörösmarty, C., Kettner, A. & Green, P. 2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308: 376-380

25. Von Hohnel, L. (1891) Discovery of Lakes Rudolf and Stefanie. Longmans, London. 26. World Commission on Dams, 2000. Dams and Development. Earthscan, London, 448 p.